Home >

Goldlion'S Counterfeiting Rights Grocery Store Was Sentenced To 5000 Yuan By The Court.

2018/5/15 18:24:00 157

GoldlionGrocery StoreFake

The "Goldlion" brand is known to many consumers, and Goldlion trademark has also been recognized as a well-known trademark.

Yesterday, the Chancheng court announced a case. Goldlion (China) Co., Ltd. found that a grocery store sold the counterfeit Goldlion trademark belt and brought it to court. The court finally decided to compensate the grocery store for 5000 yuan.

It is understood that in January 2017, under the supervision of the notary office, Zhang Mou, the principal agent of Goldlion (China) Limited (hereinafter referred to as Goldlion), came to a grocery store in Foshan and bought three Goldlion registered trademarks.

belt

The company considers that the alleged infringing product has used Goldlion trademark in belt buckles, certificate of qualification and maintenance instructions.

Goldlion believes that the grocery store openly sells counterfeit products infringing Goldlion trademark, infringes Goldlion's trademark rights, and assumes corresponding legal liabilities according to law. It requests the grocery store to stop the infringement immediately and compensate the economic losses totaling 30 thousand yuan.

The grocery store said that the products involved were not purchased in its shop, but no evidence was submitted in the trial.

The court of Chancheng found that in November 12, 2014, the trademark of Goldlion was recognized as a well-known trademark by the trademark office. It has the right to initiate a civil action against the unauthorized use of the trademark and the infringement of the right to use the trademark. It requests the grocery store to stop infringement, compensate for the loss, eliminate the influence and undertake other legal provisions.

Law

Responsibility.

According to the notarization document issued by the notary office, in January 10, 2017, the grocery store sold the goods that were alleged to be infringing on the belt.

Although the grocery store denied the sale, it did not provide evidence to prove its defense.

And the name of the business license hanging in the shop is consistent with the information of the industrial and commercial registration of the defendant. The court staff served the respondent material according to the industrial and commercial registration address of the defendant, which was sufficient to confirm that the alleged infringing goods were purchased from the defendant and sold by the defendant.

At the same time, the Court pointed out that, in comparison with the alleged infringement belt and trademark, the court found that there was a trademark logo similar to the registered trademark on the belt buckle, and there was no formal certificate, warranty card, no anti-counterfeiting query code, manufacturer and telephone address. Therefore, the law court determined that the alleged infringing goods were produced by the non Goldlion company or the company authorized by it. The behavior of the grocery store infringed Goldlion's exclusive right to use the registered trademark and constituted trademark infringement.

Goldlion's registered trademark has a high reputation in the market. The grocery store should have a certain duty of care, and it does not provide the legitimate source of the goods sold. Therefore, it should bear the legal liability to stop infringement and compensate for the loss.

Regarding the amount of compensation in the case, the court held that, because Goldlion failed to provide specific evidence of the infringement suffered during its exclusive licensing period and failed to provide evidence of all profits from the infringement of the grocery store, the court took into account the popularity of Goldlion's trademark, the scale of the defendant's grocery store, the value of the infringement, the consequences of infringement, and the subjective fault and so on to determine the amount of compensation as appropriate.

Discretionary grocery stores compensate Goldlion for economic losses of 5000 yuan.

At the same time, the court supported the reasonable cost of litigation expenses for litigation rights in this case for 3000 yuan.

Finally, the court decided that the grocery store would compensate Goldlion for its economic losses of 5000 yuan and the reasonable cost of litigation expenses for safeguarding rights, which was 3000 yuan.

  • Related reading

Humen Clothing People Gather Wisdom, What New Moves Are Brewing?

Guangdong
|
2018/3/31 14:16:00
148

"Guan Shang, Dalang Science And Technology Cup," The Eleventh China (Dalang) Woolen Garment Online Design Competition Was Officially Launched.

Guangdong
|
2018/3/29 9:10:00
115

Hongkong Guangdong Fashion Institute Held The Spring Opening Ceremony

Guangdong
|
2018/3/27 16:28:00
97

Finally, Wait For You, The Landmark Clothing Market In Guangzhou Opens In Spring.

Guangdong
|
2018/3/1 16:12:00
123

Shenzhen Hongmei Digital He Tongtong: Seize The Future Trend And Create Value For Customers.

Guangdong
|
2018/1/15 6:32:00
117
Read the next article

BALNEAIRE Fan De An Swimsuit Is Stunning "China Brand Day" - Fashion And Technology Show.

In May 12th, a "Fan Dean (BALNEAIRE) fashion swimsuit show", which was full of technology and fashion style, was overthrown by the concept of traditional swimming suit, which exploded the climax of the 2018 Chinese brand day at the Shanghai Exhibition Center. China brand day activities are important offline activities sponsored by the NDRC, the joint propaganda department and many other units, including the first China independent brand Expo and China brand development international foru